Facilitating Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skill (Hots) Through Three-Phase Reading Activity at Eis Class

Sadulloh Muzammil, Ari Widiati, Muhammad Adib Alfarisi

Abstract


The purpose of this research was to show how to facilitate students’ higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) in reading activities in English for Islamic Studies class and acknowledge students’ opinions on the activity. This was descriptive qualitative research, and its data were collected through observation and interview. Then the data were analyzed using interactive data analysis: data collection, data reduction, data display, and conclusion. The findings showed that the effort to facilitate students’ higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) is by proposing not only lower-level questions but also higher-level questions. To prevent the overuse of lower-level questions or higher-level questions, the lecturer employs the question-answer relationships (QAR) framework of the reading phase. The interview with students indicated that the students thought that the activity benefits them. Besides, the creative response questions in the post-reading phase enabled them to optimize their mind (schemata) proposing a solution to the problems found in the passage without feeling afraid of making mistakes as there is no wrong or right answer to such questions.

Keywords


Differentiated learning, Arabic language proficiency, Classroom Action Research Students

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abudhahir, R. A. S., & Ali, A. M. (2018). English for Islamic Studies: Should I Learn English?–From the Eyes of Islamic Studies Students. LSP International Journal, 5(1).

Ahmad, S., Prahmana, R. C. I., Kenedi, A. K., Helsa, Y., Arianil, Y., & Zainil, M. (2017). The instruments of higher order thinking skills. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 943, No. 1, p. 012053). IOP Publishing.

Agarwal, P. K. (2019). Retrieval practice & Bloom’s taxonomy: Do students need fact knowledge before higher order learning?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(2), 189.

Ali, A., Javed, M., & Shabbir, G. (2017). Assessing ESL Students' Literal, Reorganization and Inferential Reading Comprehension Abilities. Journal of Educational Research (1027-9776), 20(2).

Anasy, Z. (2016). HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skill) In Reading Exercise. TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, 3(1), 51-63.

Azizifar, A., Roshani, S., Gowhary, H., & Jamalinesari, A. (2015). The effect of pre-reading activities on the reading comprehension performance of ilami high school students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 188-194.

Brevik, L. M. (2019). Explicit reading strategy instruction or daily use of strategies? Studying the teaching of reading comprehension through naturalistic classroom observation in English L2. Reading and Writing, 1-30.

Biancarosa, G., & Shanley, L. (2016). What Is Fluency?. In The fluency construct (pp. 1-18). Springer, New York, NY.

Chai, M. H. (2017).  The Effects of Pre-Reading Instruction on the Comprehension of Text by ESL Readers. The English Teacher, 11.

Chamot, A. U., & Harris, V. (Eds.). (2019). Learning strategy instruction in the language classroom: Issues and Implementation. Multilingual Matters.

Chen, D., Bolton, J., & Manning, C. D. (2016). A thorough examination of the cnn/daily mail reading comprehension task. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.02858.

Daraini, A. M. (2018). Enhancing Students’ Reading Comprehension Using Question Answer Relationship (QAR) Strategy in Narrative Text (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Grade of SMA Muhammadiyah 4 Andong in the Academic Year of 2017/2018). A Graduating Paper. English Education Department. Teacher Training and Education Faculty (Doctoral dissertation, IAIN SALATIGA).

Du, X., & Cardie, C. (2017). Identifying where to focus in reading comprehension for neural question generation. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 2067-2073).

El-Sakran, A. T. (2012). Evaluation of an English for Specific Purposes (ESP) book for students of Islamic and Arabic studies. English for Specific Purposes.

Freeman, D. (2014). Reading comprehension questions: The distribution of different types in global EFL textbooks. In English Language Teaching Textbooks (pp. 72-110). Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Green, S. (2016). Two for one: Using QAR to increase reading comprehension and improve test scores. The Reading Teacher, 70(1), 103-109.

Furqon, F. (2013). Correlation between students’ vocabulary mastery and their reading comprehension. Journal of English and Education, 1(1), 68-80.

Hayikaleng, N., Nair, S. M., & Krishnasamy, H. N. (2016). Thai students’ L2 reading comprehension level for lower order thinking skills and higher order thinking skills questions. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(5), 83-91.

Hughes, C. A., Morris, J. R., Therrien, W. J., & Benson, S. K. (2017). Explicit instruction: Historical and contemporary contexts. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(3), 140-148.

Indriyana, B. S., & Kuswandono, P. (2019). Developing Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in Reading: English Teachers’ Strategies in Selected Junior High Schools. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 5(3), 204-216.

Ko, H. (2019). Becoming a Proficient Reader in Taiwan. Preparing Globally Minded Literacy Teachers: Knowledge, Practices, and Case Studies.

Kočiský, T., Schwarz, J., Blunsom, P., Dyer, C., Hermann, K. M., Melis, G., & Grefenstette, E. (2018). The narrativeqa reading comprehension challenge. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 6, 317-328.

Kusumastuti, I., Fauziati, E., & Marmanto, S. (2019). REVEALING TEACHERS’BELIEFS OF HIGHER ORDER THINKING SKILLS IN TEACHING READING AT JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL. In English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings (Vol. 3, pp. 155-162).

Li, Y., & Clark, P. (2015). Answering elementary science questions by constructing coherent scenes using background knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 2007-2012).

Lupo, S. M., Strong, J. Z., Lewis, W., Walpole, S., & McKenna, M. C. (2018). Building background knowledge through reading: Rethinking text sets. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 61(4), 433-444.

Madani, H. A. B. I. B. (2016). Assessment of reading comprehension. Revista Românească pentru Educaţie Multidimensională, 8(1), 125-147.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational researcher, 13(5), 20-30.

Muzammil, S. (2017). QAR (question answer relationship) as an alternative strategy to teach reading. Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Language Teaching, 2(2), 101-123.

Narayanan, S., & Adithan, M. (2015). Analysis of question papers in engineering courses with respect to hots (higher order thinking skills). American Journal of Engineering Education (AJEE), 6(1), 1-10.

Nourdad, N., Masoudi, S., & Rahimali, P. (2018). The Effect of Higher Order Thinking Skill Instruction on EFL Reading Ability. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(3), 231-237.

Ntim, S. K. (2015). Comprehension skill differences between proficient and less proficient reader in word-to-text integration processes: Implications for interventions for students with reading problem. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 13(3).

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2019). The nature and functions of critical & creative thinking. Rowman & Littlefield.

Putra, T. K., & Abdullah, D. F. (2019). Higher-Order Thinking Skill (HOTs) Questions in English National Examination in Indonesia. The Journal of Educational Development, 7(1), 178-185.

Rosenshine, B. V. (2017). Skill hierarchies in reading comprehension. In Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 535-554).

Routledge. van Steensel, R., Oostdam, R., van Gelderen, A., & van Schooten, E. (2016). The role of word decoding, vocabulary knowledge and meta‐cognitive knowledge in monolingual and bilingual low‐achieving adolescents' reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 39(3), 312-329.

Sekretariat GTK. (2018). Guru Harus Terus Kembangkan Model Pembelajaran HOTS. Retrived November 20, 2019, from https://gtk.kemdikbud.go.id/read-news/guru-harus-terus-kembangkan-model-pembelajaran-hots

Sharma, G. (2017). Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. International Journal of Applied Research, 3(7), 749-752.

Shen, P., & Yodkhumlue, B. (2012). A case study of teacher's questioning and students' critical thinking in college EFL reading classroom. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(1), 199.

Tanujaya, B., Mumu, J., & Margono, G. (2017). The Relationship between Higher Order Thinking Skills and Academic Performance of Student in Mathematics Instruction. International Education Studies, 10(11), 78-85.

Tarchi, C. (2015). Fostering reading comprehension of expository texts through the activation of readers’ prior knowledge and inference-making skills. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 80-88.

Teng, F. (2019). The benefits of metacognitive reading strategy awareness instruction for young learners of English as a second language. Literacy.

Thamrin, N. R., & Widodo, P. (2019). Developing Higher Order Thinking Skills (Hots) For Reading Comprehension Enhancement. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1179, No. 1, p. 012073). IOP Publishing.

Thohir, L. (2017). The Explicit Comprehension-Strategy Instruction: Question-Answer Relationship VS Self-Questioning. In UNNES International Conference on ELTLT (English Language Teaching, Literature, and Translation) (Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 305-310).

Ulum, Ö. G. (2016). A descriptive content analysis of the extent of Bloom’s taxonomy in the reading comprehension questions of the course book Q: Skills for success 4 reading and writing. The Qualitative Report, 21(9), 1674-1683.

Wilhelm, J. D. (2016). " You gotta be the book": teaching engaged and reflective reading with adolescents. Teachers College Press.

Williams, L. H. (2019). Thinking through death and employment: The automatic yet temporary use of schemata in everyday reasoning. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 22(1), 110-127.

Xu, Y., Liu, J., Gao, J., Shen, Y., & Liu, X. (2017). Towards human-level machine reading comprehension: Reasoning and inference with multiple strategies. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.04964.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24260/at-turats.v17i2.2843

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 615 times
PDF - 264 times

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 615 times
PDF - 264 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2023 Sadulloh Muzammil, Ari - Widiati, Muhammad Adib Alfarisi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Lisensi Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Pontianak
Jl. Letjend. Soeprapto No. 19
Pontianak-Kalimantan Barat
Indonesia