STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION OF FEMALE LECTURER CHARACTERISTICS IN TEACHING: A STUDY OF THE IDEOLOGY OF GENDER SEGREGATION AT STATE UNIVERSITIES IN PONTIANAK

Andina Nurul Wahidah, Khairawati Khairawati

Abstract


This study seeks to examine students’ perceptions towards the characteristics of female lecturers at State Universities in the city of Pontianak and identify the position of the ideology of gender segregation in the realm of the lecturer as an occupation. This quantitative survey research employed a closed-ended questionnaire as the primary data collection instrument. The questionnaire was administered to 286 students of faculty of education at the state Universities in the city of Pontianak. Pearson product-moment was used to test the validity of the items in the questionnaire by taking those of r>0.3 as the valid question items. The reliability test using SPSS Statistics version 23.0 showed the Cronbach alpha value of 0.75. Descriptive statistics as a data analysis method was carried out using SPSS Statistics version 23.0. The results of this study highlighted female lecturers’ characteristics and position in the ideology of gender segregation from the students’ point of view. First, students’ perception revealed (1) the characteristics of female lecturer namely sanguine personality type (33.98%), (2) the communication readiness dominated by the power factor (37.14%), and (3) personal-social characteristics at the negative extreme of easily offended (33.19%), at the central point of tolerance (14.13%), and at the positive extreme of attention (26.13%). Second, the lecturer, as an occupation in the public sector is suitable for women with a percentage of positive responses of 91.47% with the determinant factors for successful classroom teaching and learning comprising the quality cognitive, social, and personal characters of lecturers without gender segregation.

Keywords


characteristics, female lecturers, gender segregation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Citra, L. (2015). Pembagian Kerja secara Seksual dan Peran Gender dalam Buku Pelajaran SD. Jurnal Interaksi, Vol.04, No. 1. https://doi.org/10.14710/interaksi.4.1.11-21.

Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Campuran Ed.4. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Fernandes, H. J. X. (1984). Evaluation of Educational Program. Jakarta: National Education Planning, Evaluation and Curriculum Development.

Fitrianti, R., & Habibullah. (2012). Ketidaksetaraan Gender dalam Pendidikan: Studi pada Perempuan di Kecamatan Majalaya Kabupaten Karawang, Jurnal Sosiokonsepsia, Vol. 17 No. 01. https://doi.org/10.33007/ska.v17i1.809.

https://kepegawaian.untan.ac.id/data-dosen/

Khairawati., & Wahidah, A. N. (2019). Menara Penelitian: Mudah Memahami dan Mengaplikasikan Rancangan Penelitian Cetakan Kedua. Pontianak: IAIN Pontianak Press.

Kusumayanti, F. (2019). Dilema Ruang Perempuan dalam Keluarga dan Publik, Raheema: Jurnal Studi Gender dan Anak, Vol. 6 No. 2, https://doi.org/10.24260/raheema.v6i2.1514.

Liliweri, A. (1994). Perspektif Teoritis Komunikasi antar Pribadi. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Littauer, F. (2008). Personality Plus: Bagaimana Memahami Orang Lain dengan Memahami Diri Anda Sendiri. Jakarta: Binarupa Aksara.

Muawanah. (2017). Pentingnya Kompetensi Sosial bagi Dosen. Jurnal Vijjacariya, Vol. IV, No. 1. doi: 10.31219/osf.io/3ypu2.

Mustomi, D. (2018). Persepsi tentang Karakteristik Dosen terhadap Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa, Jurnal Widya Cipta, Vol II No. 1, https://doi.org/10.31294/widyacipta.v2i1.2721.g2035.

Purwaningwulan, M. M., Surya, D. A., & Rismawaty. (2013). Efektivitas Proses Belajar Mengajar Dosen Perempuan terhadap Atraksi Mereka pada Mahasiswa di UNIKOM Bandung, JIPSI: Jurnal Ilmu Politik dan Komunikasi UNIKOM, Jilid 2 Tahun 2013.

Rahmawati, D., & Riyanto, G. (2016). Menjadi Wartawati di Ranah yang Maskulin: Telaah terhadap Ideologi Pemilahan Gender dalam Kerja Jurnalistik. Prosiding Konferensi Internasional Feminisme: Persilangan Identitas, Agensi dan Politik (20 Tahun Jurnal Perempuan. Jakarta: Yayasan Jurnal Perempuan.

Robertson. (2017). What’s the Difference Between a Man Teacher and Woman Teacher online, tersedia htpp://www/site101.com/ articles/cfm/classroom-discipline.

Ruseffendi. (1988). Pengantar kepada Membantu Guru Mengembangkan Kompetensinya dalam Pengajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkan CBSA. Bandung: Tarsito.

Saputra, V.D., & Yuniawan, A. (2012). Kepribadian Dosen yang Berpengaruh terhadap Prestasi Belajar, Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen, Vol. 3 No. 2. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jdm/article/view/2437.

Setioningtyas, W.P., & Widyatmika, S. W. (2017). Analisis Karakteristik Dosen yang Berpengaruh terhadap Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa pada Perguruan Tinggi Swasta di Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Studi Manajemen dan Bisnis Vol 4 No.2. https://doi.org/10.21107/jsmb.v4i1.3227.

Simarmata, J. (2016). Karakteristik Dosen Profesional menurut Mahasiswa: Sebuah Survei di FKIP Universitas Batanghari, Jurnal Ilmiah Dikdaya, Vol. 6 No. 2. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/dikdaya.v6i2.5.

Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Suprayitni., B & Nurseto, T. (2012). Pengaruh Interaksi Jenis Kelamin Mahasiswa-Dosen dalam Pencapaian Hasil Belajar Mata Kuliah Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif di Jurusan Pendidikan Ekonomi FE UNY (Penggunaan Model Tobit), Penelitian Bidang Studi/ Ilmu/ Keahlian. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Surat Keputusan Rektor Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Pontianak Nomor 444 Tahun 2019 tentang Distribusi Dosen Tetap Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan IAIN Pontianak.

Sutriningsih, N. (2016). Persepsi Mahasiswa tentang Kompetensi Mengajar Dosen Pengampu pada Mata Kuliah Struktur Aljabar. Jurnal e-DuMath, Vol. 2, No.1. http://garuda.ristekbrin.go.id/documents/detail/450528.

UNESCO. (2004). Gender Analysis of School Curriculum and Textbook. Unesco: Islamabad.

Yuliawati, S. N. (2010). Karakter Dosen Wanita dalam Pembelajaran, Proceedings of the 4’th International Conference on Teacher Education Join Conference UPI dan UPSI. Bandung.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24260/raheema.v8i1.1659

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 84 times
PDF - 42 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Site Stats Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.