Why Indonesia Prefers A Mono-Religious Education Model? A Durkhemian Perspective

Mohamad Yusuf

Abstract

This work aims to investigate the preference of the Indonesian for a specific type of religious education model, and to provide a theoretical understanding of this preference. In particular, this study aims to answer two research questions: How do Indonesian practice mono-religious education model? How should this practice be understood from Durkheim’s concept of mechanical solidarity? Three models of ethnographical study were conducted to answer the research questions: Analysing the state’s law on education, particularly with regard to religious education, in-depth interviews with school’ managers (Kepala Sekolah) and religious education teachers as well as the students. This study found that Indonesia prefers a mono-religious education model, as shown in the State's laws on education and the practice of religious education in schools. Unlike previous studies that mainly describe the practice of certain model of religious education, this study offers conceptual understanding of the practice of religious education by Durkheim's notions of mechanical solidarity. The mono-religious model is a social fact because it consists of the norms and values that are practised by and commonly found in all members of society. Comparative studies on the practice of religious education in Muslim countries might be needed as this mono-religious education model is a common practice by Muslim societies.

Keywords

education; Indonesia; mono-religious; model; solidarity; Durkhemian

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anthony, F-V, Hermans, C.A.M., and Sterkens, C. (2005). Interpreting religious pluralism: comparative research among Christian, Muslim and Hindu students in Tamil Nadu India. Journal of Empirical Theology, 18(2), 154–186. doi: 10.1163/157092505774649252

Azra, A. (2007). Islamic Legal Education in Modern Indonesia. In R. M. Feener & M.E. Cammack (Eds.), Islamic Law in Contemporary Indonesia, Ideas and Institutions. Massachusetts: Islamic Legal Studies Program, Harvard Law Shool, Harvard University Press

Baswedan, A. R. (2004). Political Islam in Indonesia: present and future trajectory. Asian Survey, 44(5), 669–690. doi: 10.1525/as.2004.44.5.669

Buchori, M. & Malik, A. (2004). The Evolution of Higher Education in Indonesia. In P. G. Altbach & T. Umakoshi (Eds.), Asian Universities: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Challenges. Baltimore, London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Ceri, P. (1993). “Durkheim on social action.” In Durkheim sociologist and moralist, edited by Stephen P. Turner, 135–162. London: Routledge.

Durkheim, E. (1961). The rules of sociological method. (8th ed.). translated by Sarah A. Solovay & John H. Mueller. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.

---------- (1964). The division of labor in society, translated by Lewis A. Coser. New York: Free Press.

---------- (1965). The elementary forms of the religious life, translated by Joseph Ward Swain. New York: The Free Press.

Elson, R.E. (2009). “Another Look at the Jakarta Charter Controversy of 1945.” Indonesia 88 (October):105-30.

Giddens, A. (1972). Emile Durkheim: Selected writings. Edinburgh: Cambridge University Press.

Grimmitt, M. (1994). Religious education and the ideology of pluralism. British Journal of Religious Education, 16(3), 133–47. doi:10.1080/0141620940160302

Hefner, R. (2000). Civil Islam: Muslims and democratization in Indonesia. Princeton University Press.

---------- ed. (2009). Making Modern Muslims: The politics of Islamic Education in Southeast Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

---------- (2010). Muslim schools, social movements, and democracy in Indonesia. In M. S. Merry & J. A. Milligan (Eds.), Citizenship, identity, and education in Muslim communities. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hermans, C.A.M. (2003). Participatory learning: Religious education in a globalizing society. Leiden: Brill.

Hing, L. K. (1995). Education and politics in Indonesia, 1945–1965. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press.

Jackson, R. (2016). Religious education in European organizations, professional associations and research groups. In Jenny Berglund et al. (Eds.) Religious Education in a Global-Local World. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG.

Jones, R. A. (1986). Emile Durkheim: an introduction to four major works. University of Michigan: Sage Publications.

Kelabora, L. (1976). Religious instruction policy in Indonesia. Asian survey, 6(3), 230–248.

Küng, H. (1991). Global responsibility: in search of a new world ethic. London: SCM Press.

Liddle, W.R. (1996). The Islamic turn in Indonesia: a political explanation. Journal of Asian Studies, 55(3), 613–634. doi: 10.2307/2646448

---------- (2000). Indonesia in 1999: Democracy restored. Asian Survey 40, 32–40. doi: 10.2307/3021218

Mujiburrahman, M. (2019). State and Religion in Aceh: The Competences of Religious Education Teachers (Referring to ACT 14, 2005). Al-Albab, 8(1), 83 - 100. doi:https://doi.org/10.24260/alalbab.v8i1.1330

Mulligan, G. & Lederman, B. (1977). Social facts and rules of practice. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 539–550. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2778144?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents

Murray, R. T. (1988). The Islamic revival and Indonesian education. Asian Survey 28(9), 897-915

Pohl, F. (2006). Islamic education and civil society: Reflections on the pesantren tradition in contemporary Indonesia. Comparative Education Review, 50(3): 389–409. doi: 10.1086/503882

Putnam, R.D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. The Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–173. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x

Qodir, A. (2018). Multicultural Education Practices and Socio-Religious Values: The Study of Trans-Dalam Community in Central Kalimantan of Indonesia. Al-Albab, 7(2), 221-236. doi:https://doi.org/10.24260/alalbab.v7i2.1102

Raihani (2014). Creating multicultural citizens: a portrayal of contemporary Indonesian education. London, New York: Routledge.

Schröter, S. ed. (2010). Christianity in Indonesia: perspectives of power. Münster: Lit.

Sterkens, C. (2001). Interreligious learning: the problem of interreligious dialogue in primary education. Leiden: Brill.

Sterkens, C. & Anthony, F-V. (2008). A Comparative Study of Religiocentrism among Christian, Muslim and Hindu Students in Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Empirical Theology, 21(1), 32–67. doi:10.1163/092229308X310731

Sterkens, C. & Hadiwitanto, H. (2009). From social to religious conflict in Ambon: an analysis of the origins of religiously inspired violence. In Religion, civil society and conflict in Indonesia, edited by Carl Sterkens, Muhammad Machasin, and Frans Wijsen, 61–88. Münster: Lit.

Sterkens, C. & Yusuf, M. (2015). Religious education and the inter-group attitudes of Indonesian students. Journal of Empirical Theology, 28(1), 49–89. doi: 10.1163/15709256-12341324

Subagya, Y.T. (2015). Support for ethno-religious violence in Indonesia. Yogyakarta, Nijmegen: Universitas Sanata Dharma and Radbound University

Suwignyo, A. (2014). Indonesian national history textbooks after the New Order: what’s new under the sun? Bijdragen tot de Taal, Land, en Volkenkunde, 170(1), 113-131.

Turner, S.P. (1993). Emile Durkheim: sociologist and moralist. London: Routledge.

Vogt, P.W. (1993). Durkheim's sociology of law: morality and the cult of the individual. In Emile Durkheim: sociologist and moralist, edited by Stephen P. Turner, London: Routledge, p: 69–92.

Ziebertz, H-G. (2007). A move to multi empirical research concerning the attitudes of youth towards pluralism and religion's claims of truth. In Interreligious learning, edited by Didier Pollefeyt, Leuven Paris: Dudley MA. p: 3–24.

Article Metrics

Abstract views: 113 PDF views: 93