ANALISIS TINGKAT KOGNITIF SOAL UJIAN SEKOLAH PADA MATA PELAJARAN PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM BERDASARKAN TAKSONOMI BLOOM REVISI 2001
(1) Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung,
Corresponding Author
DOI : https://doi.org/10.24260/jrtie.v6i1.2696
Full Text: Language : ind
Submitted : 2023-06-12
Published : 2023-08-29
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the cognitive level of school exam questions on Islamic Religious Education subjects based on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy. Bloom's Revised Taxonomy is used as an assessment framework to describe the level of cognitive complexity requested by each exam question. The research method used was content analysis of Islamic Religious Education question banks from several schools covering primary and secondary education levels. The results of the analysis show that most of the Islamic Religious Education exam questions still concentrate on lower cognitive levels such as remembering and understanding. Higher cognitive levels such as applying, analyzing, evaluating and creating are rarely found in these questions. This indicates a tendency to use questions that tend to ask students to remember and understand religious concepts, rather than encouraging critical and analytical thinking skills
References
Amin, A., & Rokhim, F. (2020). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam: Konsepsi dan Implementasi di Sekolah. Ar-Ruzz Media.
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., ... & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Asnawi, A., & Syahruddin, S. (2020). Analysis of Cognitive Levels in Islamic Education Examination Questions for Junior High School Students. Al-Bayan: Jurnal Jurusan Pendidikan Agama Islam, 12(1), 25-39.
Alqadri, A., & Ramli, R. (2020). Analysis of Cognitive Levels of Islamic Education Questions Based on Revised Bloom's Taxonomy in Elementary School. Islamic Education Journal, 5(1), 49-62.
Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. (2006). Standar Isi untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah: Standar Kompetensi dan Kompetensi Dasar SMA/MA.
Fajar, A. M., Huda, M., & Hidayatullah, M. (2020). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Berbasis Asesmen Autentik di Madrasah Tsanawiyah. Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(2), 363-380.
Fatimah, N., & Luthfiana, R. (2019). Analysis of Cognitive Levels in Islamic Education Examination Questions for Senior High School Students. Ta'dibuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 12(1), 78-92.
Ghufron, M. N., Hidayatullah, A., & Sarim, A. (2020). Evaluasi Pembelajaran PAI Berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. At-Ta'lim Journal, 27(2), 183-192.
Giani, G., Zulkardi, Z., & Hiltrimartin, C. (2015). Analisis Tingkat Kognitif Soal-Soal Buku Teks Matematika Kelas VII Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
Ilyas, M. (2018). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam dalam Peningkatan Kualitas Guru PAI pada Perguruan Tinggi. Journal of Islamic Education Studies, 2(1), 23-34.
Popham, W. J. (2018). Classroom Assessment: What Teachers Need to Know. Pearson.
Rahmawati, R., Lestari, F., & Umam, R. (2019). Analysis of the Effectiveness of Learning in the Use of Learning Modules Against Student Learning Outcomes. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 2(3), 233-240.
Rasyid, A. N., & Hidayatullah, M. (2018). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam: Teori, Praktik, dan Instrumen. Ta'dib Press.
Sholihah, A. H. (2021). Materi PAI Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Kognitif Taksonomi Bloom Revisi Dalam Buku Teks PAI dan Budi Pekerti Terbitan Kemendikbud Tahun 2021. Skripsi Sarjana, FITK UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Susilo, H. (2019). Panduan Praktis Penyusunan Soal Evaluasi Pembelajaran. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Zuhri, M. (2020). Implementasi Taksonomi Bloom dalam Peningkatan Mutu Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di SMA Darusy Syafa’ah Kotagajah Tahun Ajaran 2019/2020. Disertasi Doktoral, IAIN Metro
Article Metrics
Abstract Views : 269 timesPDF Downloaded : 189 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.