The Implementation of Supreme Court Regulations Number 1/2016 Concerning The Procedure of In-Court Mediation on Economy Sharia Dispute (A Case Study in Blitar Religious Court)

kutbuddin aibak

Abstract


The sharia economic dispute resolution process in Indonesia has two paths which can be taken by litigants, namely litigation in court and non-litigation. This research was motivated by sharia economic dispute cases handled by Blitar Religious Court which were carried out through a mediation but failed. The failure of this mediation process and the factors behind the failure are important issues to be studied. Consequently, Supreme Court Regulation No. 1/2016 becomes important to be used as the basis of analysis, whether this regulation has been implemented or not. Therefore, this study aims to describe and analyze the implementation of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 1/2016 concerning the procedure of in-court mediation on economy sharia disputes in Blitar Religious Court, along with various obstacles and solutions.

Keywords


PERMA No. 1/2016, Sharia Economic Disputes, Mediation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abbas, Syahrizal. 2009. Mediasi dalam Perspektif Hukum Syariah, Hukum Adat dan Hukum Nasional, Jakarta: Kencana.

Abdul Manan. 2005. Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama, cet-3, Jakarta: Kencana.

Ambert, Ann Marie, Patricia A. Adler, Peter Adler and Daniel F. Detzner. 1995. Understanding and Evaluating Qualitative Research, Vol. 57 No. 4, November.

Arifin, Zainal. 2011. Penelitian Pendidikan Metode dan Paradigma Baru, Bandung: RosdaKarya.

Arto, Mukti. 2005. Praktek Perkara Perdata Pada Pengadilan Agama cet. VI; Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar Offset.

Dokumen putusan No. 3333/Pdt.G/2014/PA.BL

Fuady, Munir. 2003. Arbitrase Nasional: Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Harahap, M. Yahya. 2004. Tinjauan Sistem Peradilan dalam Mediasi dan Perdamaian Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung RI.

Harahap, M. Yahya. 2005. Hukum Acara Perdata, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Hoynes, John Michael, Cretchen L. Haynes, dan Larry Sun Fang. 2004.

Mediation: Positive Conflict Management, New York: SUNY Press.

Mahkamah Agung RI, 2004. Mediasi dan Perdamaian, Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung RI.

Mahkamah Agung RI, Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan.

Mappiare AT, Andi. 2009. Dasar-dasar Metodologi Riset Kualitatif untuk Ilmu Sosial dan Profesi, Malang: Jenggala Pustaka Utama.

Martokusumo, Sudikno. 2002. Hukum Acara Perdata, Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Moore, Christopher W. 1996. The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies For Resolving Conflict, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher.

Mujahidin, Ahmad. 2008. Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama dan Mahkamah Syar'iyah Di Indonesia, Jakarta Pusat: Ikatan Hakim Indonesia IKAHI.

Musthofa. 2005. Kepaniteraan Peradilan Agama, Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Pasal 49 huruf i Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 Tentang Peradilan Agama

Poerwadarminta, W.J.S. 1985. Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia, cet. 8, Jakarta: P.N. Balai Pustaka

Pusat Mediasi Nasional (the Indonesian Mediation Center), Kode Etik Mediator, dikutip dalam www.pmn.or.id

Pusat Mediasi Nasional (the Indonesian Mediation Center), Kode Etik Mediator, dikutip dalam www.pmn.or.id Pasal 6.

Raco, J.R. 2010. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Jenis, Karakteristik dan Keunggulannya, Jakarta: PT Grasindo.

Saifullah. 2007. Refleksi Sosiologis Hukum, Bandung: Reflika Aditama.

Sutantio, Retno Wulan, dan Iskandar Oeripkarta Winata. 2002. Hukum Acara Perdata Dalam Teori dan Praktek, cet.9 Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Sutiyono, Bambang. 2008. Hukum Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, Yogyakarta: Gama Media.

Tanzeh, Ahmad. 2004. Metode Penelitian Praktis, Jakarta: PT. Bina Ilmu.

Umam, Khotibul. 2010. Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan, Yogyakarta: Penerbit Pustaka Yustisia.

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24260/khatulistiwa.v9i2.1481

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 27 times
PDF - 8 times

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 27 times
PDF - 8 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Khatulistiwa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
Khatulistiwa by https://jurnaliainpontianak.or.id/index.php/khatulistiwa is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Statistic Counter