CONTESTING THE MEANINGS OF DISASTER: AN ANTHROPOLOGICAL STUDY ON YOGYAKARTA PEOPLE’S RESPONSES TO THE MAY 27, 2006 EARTHQUAKE

Mohammad Hasan Basri

Abstract

Secara geografis, Indonesia merupakan negara yang sangat berpotensi atau rawan terjadi bencana baik berupa bencana alam (natural disaster) maupun bencana akibat ulah kelalaian manusia (man-made disaster). Namun sayang sekali, para akademisi dan para peneliti masih sedikit yang tertarik untuk lebih jauh mengkaji bencana utamanya dalam perpektif ilmu-ilmu sosial. Sebagai salah satu upaya memulai kajian bencana di negeri ini, thesis ini diharapkan menjadi titik awal pengembangan ilmu-ilmu sosial dalam kajian bencana. Paper ini menyimpulkan bahwa proses kontestasi pemaknaan masyarakat dalam merespon bencana gempa dipengaruhi oleh tiga aspek, yaitu agama (religious meaning), Budaya Jawa (Javanese meaning), dan penjelasan sains (scientific meaning). Walaupun ketiga aspek tersebut saling mempengaruhi satu sama lain, berdasarkan respon masyarakat Wonokromo, aspek agama sangat mendominasi pikiran mereka. Ada empat variasi pemaknaan yang didasarkan pada aspek agama, yakni bencana sebagai hukuman, cobaan, tes, dan surat cinta dari Tuhan. Respon ini secara implisit masih problematis terutama jika dikaitkan dengan masalah theodicy (problem of evil) di dalam teologi dan proses pemulihan bencana karena pandangan seperti ini cenderung memojokkan korban (blaming the victims).

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdullah, Irwan, 2006, Dialektika Nature, Kultur dan Struktur: Analisis Konteks, Proses, dan Ranah dalam Konstruksi Bencana, Yogyakarta:UGM.

Afnan, Soheil M., 1958, Avicenna: His Life and Works, London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.

Ahimsa-Putra, Heddy Shri, 1997, “Sungai dan Air Ciliwung: Sebuah Kajian Etnoekologi” in Prisma 1, Januari 1997.

Amhar, Fahmi, 2006, “Mitos, Sains dan Iman di Tengah Bencana” in Kedaulatan Rakyat, June 12, 2006.

Anderskov, Christina, 2004, Anthropology and Disaster, www.AnhtroBase.com

Armstrong, Karen, 2005, A Short History of Myth, New York: Canongate.

Bankoff, Greg, Georg Frerks, and Dorothea Hilhorst (Eds), 2004, Mapping Vulnerability, London: Earthscan.

Benz, Arnold, 2003, “Tragedy Versus Hope: What Future in an Open Universe?” in Willem B. Drees, Is Nature Ever Evil? Religion, Science and Value. New York: Routledge.

Blaikie, P., T. Cannon, I. Davis and B. Wisner. 1994. At Risk: Natural hazards, people´s vulnerability, and disaster. London. Routledge.

Cahanar, P., 2005, Bencana Gempa dan Tsunami, Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas

Chester, David K., 2005, Theology and Disaster Studies: the Need for Dialogue, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 146 (2005) 319-328.

Drees, Willem B, 2003, “This Vale of Tears – The Best of All Possible Worlds?” in Willem B. Drees (Ed.), Is Nature Ever Evil? Religion, Science and Value. New York: Routledge.

Fritz, Charles E., 1989, “Disasters” in David L. Sills (Ed) International Ecyclopedia of Social Sciences, Vol. 4.

García-Acosta, Virginia, 2002, “Historical Disaster Researh” in Susanna M. Hoffman and Anthony Oliver-Smith (Eds), Catastrophe & Culture: Anthropology of Disaster, Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.

Hefner, Philip, 2003, “Nature Good and Evil: A Theological Palette”, in Willem B. Drees, Is Nature Ever Evil? Religion, Science and Value. New York: Routledge.

Hoffman, Susanna M. and Anthony Oliver-Smith, 1999, The Angry Earth: Disaster in Anthropological Perspective, New York: Routledge.

Homan, Jacqueline, 2001, A Culturally Sensitive Approach to Risk? “Natural” Hazard Perception in Egypt and the UK, Australian Journal of Emergency Management, Winter-2001.

Inati, Shams C, 2000, The Problem of Evil: Ibn Sînâ’s Theodicy, New York: Global Publications.

Koentjaraningrat, 1994, Kebudayaan Jawa, Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Martin, Richard C., and Mark R. Woodward with Dwi S. Atmaja,1997, Defenders of Reason in Islam: Mu’tazilism from Medieval School to Modern Symbol, Oxford: One World.

McGuire, Meredith B., 1981, Religion: The Social Context, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Munjid, Ahmad, “Memperebutkan Makna Bencana” in Koran Tempo, April 13, 2007.

Ngelow, Zakaria J.(Ed.), 2006, Teologi Bencana, Makassar: OASE INTIM

Novriantoni, 2005, Tuhan Pasca-Tsunami, KOMPAS (Opini), January 14, 2005

Oliver-Smith, Anthony, 1996, “Anthropological Research on Research and “Disasters” in Annual Review of Anthropology.1996.25: 303-28

Oliver-Smith, Anthony, 1996, “Disaster Studies” in David Levinson and Melvin Ember (Eds), Encyclopedia of Cultural Anthropology, New York: Henry Holt and Company.

Ormsby, Eric L., 1984, Theodicy in Islamic Thought: the Dispute Over Al-Ghazali’s “Best of All Possible Worlds”, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Pelling, Mark, 2003, “Paradigms of Risk” in Natural Disasters and Development in a Globalizing World, New York: Routledge.

Radford, Luis, 2006, “The Anthropology of Meaning” in Springer 2006.

Schlehe, Judith, 2007 “Cultural Politics of Natural Disasters: Discourses on Volcanic Eruptions in Indonesia” in Michael J. Casimir and Ute Stahl (eds.) Culture and the Changing Environment: Uncertainty, Cognition, and Risk Management in Cross-Cultural Perpsective, New York: Berghahn.

Spradley, J.P., 1975, “Adaptive Strategies of Urban Nomads: the Ethnoscience of Tramp Culture” in J. Friedl and N.J. Chairman (eds), City Ways: A Selective Reader in urban Anthropology, New York: Thomas Y. Cromwell.

Winardi, A., at al, 2006, Gempa Jogja, Indonesia, and Dunia, Jakarta: Gramedia.

Wisner, Ben, Piers Blaikie, Terry Cannon, and Ian Davis (Eds), 1994, At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters, New York: Routledge.

Woodward, Mark. R.,2001, Islam in Java: Normative Piety and Mysticism (Transl.), Yogyakarta: LKiS.

Zoetmulder, P.J., 1983, Kalangwan: A Survey of Old Javanese Literature, Jakarta: Djambatan.

Article Metrics

Abstract views: 673 PDF views: 540