Architecture of Peace in Ambon: Reading Dynamics of Peace After Ten Years of Conflict
Abstract
The dynamics of peace in Ambon have been getting stronger during the last ten years, but to what extent this phenomenon can be considered as a solid basis for peace, would require a critical analysis. This paper is the result of field research on peace in Ambon using the theory of "peace architecture" developed by Luc Reychland (2006). The results of the analysis obtained several important conclusions. First, the peace process in the city of Ambon has been going on in a participatory manner in various aspects of life. Second, in an architectural perspective as put forward by Reychland, the peace in Ambon has sufficient potential to develop into a structure of peace which is getting stronger. It is characterized by the strengthening of an increasingly inclusive dialog and communication between citizens, as well as the effectiveness of public arenas such as markets, offices, schools and coffee shops as a medium of integration. It is also supported by the accommodative practices of economic and political transformation. Third, in line with the positive development, the public still need to be reminded of radical religious ideas and identity politics that are harmful to the sustainability of peace.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahnaf, Mohammad Iqbal. 2013. Mengelola Keragaman dari Bawah, Ko-Eksistensi Santr-Tionhoa di Lasem Kawa Tengah. Yogyakarta; Sekolah Pascasarjana UGM.
Bertrand, Jacques. 2004. Nationalism anda Ethnic Conflict in Indonesia. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Blau, Peter Michael & Joseph E. Schwartz. 1984. Crosscutting Social Circles: Testing a Macrostructural Theory of Interrelation. Orlando: Academic Press.
Denzin, N.K. & YS. Lincoln. 1994. Handbook of Qualitatif Research. California: Sage Publication.
Eisenstadt, S. N and L. Roniger. 1984. Patrons, Clients and Friends; Interpersonal Relations and the Structure of Trust in Society. London: Cambridge University Press.
Ernas, Saidin. 2012. “Policy of Social Conflict Resolution; Implementation of the Malino Agreement.” in Journal of Govermant and Politics, Volume 3. Nomor 2.
J, H. (2016). Dinamika Hubungan Islam dan Agama Lokal di Indonesia: Pengalaman Towani Tolotang di Sulawesi Selatan. Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama Dan Sosial Budaya, 1(2), 179-186. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15575/jw.v1i2.744
L. Eck, Diana. 2001. New Religious America; How a Cristian Country has Become the World Most Religiousy Diversity Nation. New York: The Continum Internastional Publishing.
Parekh, Biku. 2008. Rethinking Multiculturalism, Keragaman Budaya dan Teori Politik. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Pranawati, Rita. 2011. Kebebasan Beragama dan Integrasi Sosial. Jakarta: Center for Study of Religion and Culture (CSRC).
Prasetyo, Eko. 2002. Memahami Wajah Para Pembela Agama,Potret Gerakan Islam dalam Pusaran Arus Global. Yogyakarta: Insist.
Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making Democracy Work. USA: Princeton.
Reychland, Luc. 2006. Researcher Peace Building Architectur. Leuven: Centre for Peace Research and Strategic Studies.
------------- 1999. Democratic Peace-Building and Conflict Prevention: The Devil is in the Transition. Leuven: University Press.
Ritzer, George. 1992. Sosiologi Ilmu Pengetahuan Berparadigma Ganda. Jakarta; Rajawali Press.
Rozi, Syafuan (at al.). 2006. Kekerasan Komunal; Anatomi dan Resolusi Konflik di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar dan LIPI.
Subair (at al.),. 2008. Segregasi Pemukiman Berdasarkan Agama. Yogyakarta: Graha Gur.
Syahmidi. 2014. ‘Implementasi Pendidikan Multikultural dengan Model Kepemimpinan Demokrasi Kepala Sekolah Menengah Atas Katolik St. Petrus Kanisius Palangka Raya. in Jurnal Studi Islam dan Masyarakat. Vol. 8. No. 2. P: 156-183.
Tomsa, Dirk. 2008. “Electoral Democracy in Devided Society; The 2008 Gibernatorial Electon in Maluku, Indonesia.” in Journal of South East Asia Research, 17, 2, p: 229–259.
Varshney, Asutosh. 2003. Ethnic Conflict and Civic Life: Hindus and Muslims in India. New Haven: Yale University.