Andini Linarsih


As culture and religion are indispensable part of the Indonesian society, understanding students’ cultural and religious background constitutes one of the important factors in the success of foreign language teaching, particularly English. Non-native English speaking teachers can improve students’ English competence because they are capable of bridging the cultural and religious differences between the source language and the target language as well as providing an easy-to-understand explanation regarding the vocabulary and grammatical aspects of the source language. In addition, they can better understand the students’ needs and design a more realistic syllabus to overcome students’ language barriers. However, the role of native English speaking teachers (NESTs) can also fill the weaknesses Non-native English speaking teachers (NNESTs) face in increasing the communicative competence. Therefore, better instruction is not merely related to the native or non native concepts. It lies on the personal qualities of the teachers to apply proper language teaching methods to boost students’ communicative skills.

Keywords: Native English Speaking Teachers (NESTs), Non-Native English Speaking Teachers (NNESTs), Student, Culture, Religion.

Full Text:



Brown, H. (2007). Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy. New York: Pearson Education.

Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. England: Person Education Limited

McArthur, T. (1998). The English Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McKay, S. (2002). Teaching English as an international language. New York: Oxford University Press.

Medgyes, P. (2006). When the teacher is a Non-Native Speaker. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.) Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (pp. 429-442). Beijing: Foreign Language teaching and Research Press.

Mizuno, C. (no year). Non-native English speakers of English teaching in Japan – critical perspectives on TESOL in an educational context. Retrieved November 4, 2010 from:

Nakata, Y. (2010). Improving the classroom language proficiency of non-native teachers of English: what and how?. RELC journal (41)1 76-90.

Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Boston : Heinle & Heinle.

Oka, H. (2004). A Non-native Approach to ELT: Universal or Asian?. Retrieved November 4, 2010, from:

Pasternak M, and Bailey KM (2004) ‘Preparing Nonnative and Native English-speaking Teachers: Issues of Professionalism and Proficiency’. In Kamhi-Stein LD (ed.) Learning and Teaching from Experience: Perspectives on Nonnative English-speaking Professionals. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 155-75.

Rampton, M. 1990. Displacing the ‘native speaker: expertise, affiliation, and inheritance. ELT journal 44/2, pp. 97-101.

Seidlhofer, B. (1999) Double standards: teacher education in the Expanding Circle, World Englishes, 18(2):233-244.

Shishavan, H. The relationship between Iranian English language teachers’ and learners’ gender and their perception of an effective Engliah language teacher. English Language Teaching. English Language Teaching Journal 3(3) retrieved on November 4th, 2010.

Zacharias, N. (2003). A survey of tertiary teachers’ beliefs about English Language Teaching in Indonesia with regard to the role of English as a global language. 20 October 2010

Article Metrics

Abstract views: 544 PDF views: 306